<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commenting disabled motivates me to comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplemotives.com/2009/12/21/commenting-disabled-motivates-me-to-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplemotives.com/2009/12/21/commenting-disabled-motivates-me-to-comment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 15:59:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.simplemotives.com/2009/12/21/commenting-disabled-motivates-me-to-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplemotives.com/?p=251#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joseph for the reply.

I know that monitoring comment spam on older posts gets to be a pain.  You are so removed from the context and content of the post that you must reread them sometimes to determine if the comment is even remotely in scope.  

I&#039;ll be honest, I didn&#039;t notice the date on your post until after I had hacked out a response.  

Originally, I was under the impression that @CaseySoftware was linking to your response to the Page Rank algorithm being made public as well, from a slightly different perspective.  Which I eventually realized was not the case.

Either way, I wanted to contribute the Seomoz Search Engine Ranking Factors (http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors) link to your post and see if that swayed your opinion on the matter at all. 

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joseph for the reply.</p>
<p>I know that monitoring comment spam on older posts gets to be a pain.  You are so removed from the context and content of the post that you must reread them sometimes to determine if the comment is even remotely in scope.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, I didn&#8217;t notice the date on your post until after I had hacked out a response.  </p>
<p>Originally, I was under the impression that @CaseySoftware was linking to your response to the Page Rank algorithm being made public as well, from a slightly different perspective.  Which I eventually realized was not the case.</p>
<p>Either way, I wanted to contribute the Seomoz Search Engine Ranking Factors (<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors</a>) link to your post and see if that swayed your opinion on the matter at all. </p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://www.simplemotives.com/2009/12/21/commenting-disabled-motivates-me-to-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplemotives.com/?p=251#comment-74</guid>
		<description>As Keith mentioned in his tweet, yes, I do have commenting set to auto-close after three weeks of the posting date to prevent spam on old posts. I was finding that 95% of the comments after a couple of weeks were spam. The remaining 5% were either of questionable legitimacy, or weren&#039;t really adding much at the end of the conversation.

I was a little surprised that my post didn&#039;t get any comments after three weeks, as I realize my opinion was a bit contentious.

In the meantime, I&#039;ve temporarily reopened comments on all articles regardless of date. If you want to continue a conversation about SEO over there, I&#039;d be happy to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Keith mentioned in his tweet, yes, I do have commenting set to auto-close after three weeks of the posting date to prevent spam on old posts. I was finding that 95% of the comments after a couple of weeks were spam. The remaining 5% were either of questionable legitimacy, or weren&#8217;t really adding much at the end of the conversation.</p>
<p>I was a little surprised that my post didn&#8217;t get any comments after three weeks, as I realize my opinion was a bit contentious.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;ve temporarily reopened comments on all articles regardless of date. If you want to continue a conversation about SEO over there, I&#8217;d be happy to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.320 seconds -->
